Product Code Database
Example Keywords: hat -mario $64-147
barcode-scavenger
   » Wiki: Double Layer (surface Science)
Tag Wiki 'Double Layer (surface Science)'.
Tag

In , a double layer ( DL, also called an electrical double layer, EDL) is a structure that appears on the of an object when it is exposed to a . The object might be a particle, a , a liquid , or a . The DL refers to two parallel layers of surrounding the object. The first layer, the (either positive or negative), consists of which are onto the object due to chemical interactions. The second layer is composed of ions attracted to the surface charge via the , electrically screening the first layer. This second layer is loosely associated with the object. It is made of free ions that move in the fluid under the influence of and rather than being firmly anchored. It is thus called the "diffuse layer".

Interfacial DLs are most apparent in systems with a large surface-area-to-volume ratio, such as a or porous bodies with particles or pores (respectively) on the scale of to . However, DLs are important to other phenomena, such as the behaviour of .

DLs play a fundamental role in many everyday substances. For instance, exists only because droplets are covered with a DL that prevents their coagulation into . DLs exist in practically all fluid-based systems, such as blood, paint, ink and ceramic and cement .

The DL is closely related to electrokinetic phenomena and electroacoustic phenomena.


Development of the (interfacial) double layer

Helmholtz
When an electronic conductor is brought in contact with a solid or liquid ionic conductor (electrolyte), a common boundary (interface) among the two phases appears. Hermann von Helmholtz was the first to realize that electrodes immersed in electrolyte solutions repel the co-ions of the charge while attracting counterions to their surfaces. Two layers of opposite polarity form at the interface between electrode and electrolyte. In 1853, he showed that an electrical double layer (DL) is essentially a dielectric and stores charge electrostatically. Below the electrolyte's decomposition voltage, the stored charge is linearly dependent on the voltage applied.

This early model predicted a constant differential capacitance independent from the charge density depending on the dielectric constant of the electrolyte and the thickness of the double-layer.Srinivasan S. (2006) Fuel cells, from Fundamentals to Applications, Springer eBooks, , Chapter 2, Electrode/electrolyte interfaces: Structure and kinetics of charge transfer. (769 kB)

This model, while a good foundation for the description of the interface, does not consider important factors including diffusion/mixing of ions in solution, the possibility of onto the surface, and the interaction between solvent dipole moments and the electrode.


Gouy–Chapman
Louis Georges Gouy in 1910 and David Leonard Chapman in 1913 both observed that capacitance was not a constant and that it depended on the applied potential and the ionic concentration. The "Gouy–Chapman model" made significant improvements by introducing a model of the DL. In this model, the charge distribution of ions as a function of distance from the metal surface allows Maxwell–Boltzmann statistics to be applied. Thus the electric potential decreases exponentially away from the surface of the fluid bulk.

Gouy-Chapman layers may bear special relevance in bioelectrochemistry. The observation of long-distance inter-protein electron transfer through the aqueous solution has been attributed to a diffuse region between redox partner proteins ( and c1) that is depleted of cations in comparison to the solution bulk, thereby leading to reduced screening, electric fields extending several nanometers, and currents decreasing quasi exponentially with the distance at rate ~1 nm−1. This region is termed "Gouy-Chapman conduit" and is strongly regulated by phosphorylation, which adds one negative charge to the protein surface that disrupts cationic depletion and prevents long-distance charge transport. Similar effects are observed at the redox active site of .


Stern
The Gouy-Chapman model fails for highly charged DLs. In 1924, suggested combining the Helmholtz model with the Gouy-Chapman model: in Stern's model, some ions adhere to the electrode as suggested by Helmholtz, giving an internal Stern layer, while some form a Gouy-Chapman diffuse layer.

The Stern layer accounts for ions' finite size and consequently an ion's closest approach to the electrode is on the order of the ionic radius. The Stern model has its own limitations, namely that it effectively treats ions as point charges, assumes all significant interactions in the are , assumes dielectric permittivity to be constant throughout the double layer, and that fluid viscosity is constant plane.


Grahame
. C. Grahame modified the Stern model in 1947. He proposed that some ionic or uncharged species can penetrate the Stern layer, although the closest approach to the electrode is normally occupied by solvent molecules. This could occur if ions lose their as they approach the electrode. He called ions in direct contact with the electrode "specifically adsorbed ions". This model proposed the existence of three regions. The inner Helmholtz plane (IHP) passes through the centres of the specifically adsorbed ions. The outer Helmholtz plane (OHP) passes through the centres of solvated ions at the distance of their closest approach to the electrode. Finally the diffuse layer is the region beyond the OHP.


Bockris/Devanathan/Müller (BDM)
In 1963, , M. A. V. Devanathan and Klaus Müller proposed the BDM model of the double-layer that included the action of the solvent in the interface. They suggested that the attached molecules of the solvent, such as water, would have a fixed alignment to the electrode surface. This first layer of solvent molecules displays a strong orientation to the electric field depending on the charge. This orientation has great influence on the of the solvent that varies with field strength. The IHP passes through the centers of these molecules. Specifically adsorbed, partially solvated ions appear in this layer. The solvated ions of the electrolyte are outside the IHP. Through the centers of these ions pass the OHP. The diffuse layer is the region beyond the OHP.


Trasatti/Buzzanca
Further research with double layers on ruthenium dioxide films in 1971 by Sergio Trasatti and Giovanni Buzzanca demonstrated that the electrochemical behavior of these electrodes at low voltages with specific adsorbed ions was like that of capacitors. The specific adsorption of the ions in this region of potential could also involve a partial charge transfer between the ion and the electrode. It was the first step towards understanding pseudocapacitance.


Conway
Between 1975 and 1980, Brian Evans Conway conducted extensive fundamental and development work on electrochemical capacitors. In 1991, he described the difference between 'Supercapacitor' and 'Battery' behavior in electrochemical energy storage. In 1999, he coined the term supercapacitor to explain the increased capacitance by surface redox reactions with faradaic charge transfer between electrodes and ions.A.K. Shukla, T.P. Kumar, Electrochemistry Encyclopedia, Pillars of modern electrochemistry: A brief history Central Electrochemical Research Institute, (November, 2008)

His "supercapacitor" stored electrical charge partially in the Helmholtz double-layer and partially as the result of faradaic reactions with "pseudocapacitance" charge transfer of electrons and protons between electrode and electrolyte. The working mechanisms of pseudocapacitors are redox reactions, intercalation and electrosorption.


Marcus
The physical and mathematical basics of electron charge transfer absent chemical bonds leading to pseudocapacitance was developed by Rudolph A. Marcus. explains the rates of electron transfer reactions—the rate at which an electron can move from one chemical species to another. It was originally formulated to address outer sphere electron transfer reactions, in which two chemical species change only in their charge, with an electron jumping. For redox reactions without making or breaking bonds, Marcus theory takes the place of Henry Eyring's transition state theory which was derived for reactions with structural changes. Marcus received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1992 for this theory.


Mathematical description
There are detailed descriptions of the interfacial DL in many books on colloid and interface scienceDukhin, S.S. & Derjaguin, B.V. "Electrokinetic Phenomena", J.Willey and Sons, 1974Russel, W.B., Saville, D.A. and Schowalter, W.R. "Colloidal Dispersions", Cambridge University Press,1989Kruyt, H.R. "Colloid Science", Elsevier: Volume 1, Irreversible systems, (1952) and microscale fluid transport.
(2025). 9780521119030, Cambridge University Press. .
There is also a recent IUPAC technical report"Measurement and Interpretation of Electrokinetic Phenomena", International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Technical Report, published in Pure Appl.Chem., vol 77, 10, pp.1753-1805, 2005 (pdf) on the subject of interfacial double layer and related electrokinetic phenomena.

As stated by Lyklema, "...the reason for the formation of a "relaxed" ("equilibrium") double layer is the non-electric affinity of charge-determining ions for a surface..."Lyklema, J. "Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science", vol.2, page.3.208, 1995 This process leads to the buildup of an electric surface charge, expressed usually in C/m2. This surface charge creates an electrostatic field that then affects the ions in the bulk of the liquid. This electrostatic field, in combination with the thermal motion of the ions, creates a counter charge, and thus screens the electric surface charge. The net electric charge in this screening diffuse layer is equal in magnitude to the net surface charge, but has the opposite polarity. As a result, the complete structure is electrically neutral.

The diffuse layer, or at least part of it, can move under the influence of stress. There is a conventionally introduced slipping plane that separates mobile fluid from fluid that remains attached to the surface. Electric potential at this plane is called electrokinetic potential or (also denoted as ζ-potential).

(2025). 9780471176251, Wiley.

The electric potential on the external boundary of the Stern layer versus the bulk electrolyte is referred to as . Electric potential difference between the fluid bulk and the surface is called the electric surface potential.

Usually is used for estimating the degree of DL charge. A characteristic value of this electric potential in the DL is 25 mV with a maximum value around 100 mV (up to several volts on electrodesV.S. Bogotsky, Fundamentals of Electrochemistry, Wiley-Interscience, 2006.). The chemical composition of the sample at which the ζ-potential is 0 is called the point of zero charge or the iso-electric point. It is usually determined by the solution pH value, since protons and hydroxyl ions are the charge-determining ions for most surfaces.

Zeta potential can be measured using , electroacoustic phenomena, streaming potential, and electroosmotic flow.

The characteristic thickness of the DL is the , κ−1. It is reciprocally proportional to the square root of the ion concentration C. In aqueous solutions it is typically on the scale of a few nanometers and the thickness decreases with increasing concentration of the electrolyte.

The electric field strength inside the DL can be anywhere from zero to over 109 V/m. These steep electric potential gradients are the reason for the importance of the DLs.

The theory for a flat surface and a symmetrical electrolyte is usually referred to as the Gouy-Chapman theory. It yields a simple relationship between electric charge in the diffuse layer σd and the Stern potential Ψd:

\sigma^d = -\sqrt

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
1s Time